You are here

UCF Digital Collections ยป Honors Collection

PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND PLEA BARGAINING: IS THERE A JURY TRIAL PENALTY?

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2011
Abstract/Description:
As the most powerful position of the courtroom workgroup, the prosecutor plays an essential role in the criminal justice system. From the defendant's initial contact with the criminal court process when the prosecutor makes the charging decision, until sentencing when the prosecutor's recommendation guides judicial discretion, prosecutors hold the power to decide a defendant's fate. Despite the parameters that govern their ability to use discretion, the prosecutor still maintains a significant amount of power to influence crucial decisions with regard to the defendant. The current study addresses the issue of prosecutorial discretion and the ability to mishandle the powers bestowed upon such a powerful position. While prosecutorial discretion has a broad base, the study was narrowed to specifically concentrate on discretion as it impacts plea bargaining and final dispositions. Additionally, an analysis of the data looks at whether or not a defendant faces jury trial penalty for exercising his/her constitutional right to a trial by jury. A statistical comparison was constructed using data collected with respect to specific murder and sexual battery statutes over a 24-month period. Based on the statistical data provided within the study, those individuals who accepted the plea deal offered by the state faced a far less severe punishment than those who opted to go to trial.
Title: PROSECUTORIAL DISCRETION AND PLEA BARGAINING: IS THERE A JURY TRIAL PENALTY?.
28 views
16 downloads
Name(s): Hall, Gina, Author
Eastep, Ph.D., Mary Ann, Committee Chair
University of Central Florida, Degree Grantor
Type of Resource: text
Date Issued: 2011
Publisher: University of Central Florida
Language(s): English
Abstract/Description: As the most powerful position of the courtroom workgroup, the prosecutor plays an essential role in the criminal justice system. From the defendant's initial contact with the criminal court process when the prosecutor makes the charging decision, until sentencing when the prosecutor's recommendation guides judicial discretion, prosecutors hold the power to decide a defendant's fate. Despite the parameters that govern their ability to use discretion, the prosecutor still maintains a significant amount of power to influence crucial decisions with regard to the defendant. The current study addresses the issue of prosecutorial discretion and the ability to mishandle the powers bestowed upon such a powerful position. While prosecutorial discretion has a broad base, the study was narrowed to specifically concentrate on discretion as it impacts plea bargaining and final dispositions. Additionally, an analysis of the data looks at whether or not a defendant faces jury trial penalty for exercising his/her constitutional right to a trial by jury. A statistical comparison was constructed using data collected with respect to specific murder and sexual battery statutes over a 24-month period. Based on the statistical data provided within the study, those individuals who accepted the plea deal offered by the state faced a far less severe punishment than those who opted to go to trial.
Identifier: CFH0004096 (IID), ucf:44793 (fedora)
Note(s): 2011-12-01
B.S.
Health and Public Affairs, Dept. of Criminal Justice
Bachelors
This record was generated from author submitted information.
Subject(s): Prosecutor
discretion
plea bargaining
jury trial penalty
defendant's rights
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/ucf/fd/CFH0004096
Restrictions on Access: public
Host Institution: UCF

In Collections