You are here
Governmental Responses to Terrorism: Creating Costs and Benefits
- Date Issued:
- 2013
- Abstract/Description:
- This thesis assesses four governmental responses to terrorism: conciliation, denial, legal restriction, and violence, each of which may be focused on an organization or its leaders. The theory makes predictions on the resulting frequency and severity of terrorism. Unlessresponses reduce an organization's capacity or desire to attack, the frequency of attacks may be reduced, while the severity continues to increase. The theory is tested using a time series regression analysis of the effects of government action on terrorism in Algeria and thePhilippines. In general, the results show that conciliation may led to increases in terrorism in the short term while suggesting potential reductions in the long term. Denial and legal restriction often led to increases in terrorism, while the effects of violence often depended upon whether the response was applied to organizations or their leaders.
Title: | Governmental Responses to Terrorism: Creating Costs and Benefits. |
23 views
11 downloads |
---|---|---|
Name(s): |
Klose, Kenneth, Author Dolan, Thomas, Committee Chair Schafer, Mark, Committee Member Mirilovic, Nikola, Committee Member , Committee Member University of Central Florida, Degree Grantor |
|
Type of Resource: | text | |
Date Issued: | 2013 | |
Publisher: | University of Central Florida | |
Language(s): | English | |
Abstract/Description: | This thesis assesses four governmental responses to terrorism: conciliation, denial, legal restriction, and violence, each of which may be focused on an organization or its leaders. The theory makes predictions on the resulting frequency and severity of terrorism. Unlessresponses reduce an organization's capacity or desire to attack, the frequency of attacks may be reduced, while the severity continues to increase. The theory is tested using a time series regression analysis of the effects of government action on terrorism in Algeria and thePhilippines. In general, the results show that conciliation may led to increases in terrorism in the short term while suggesting potential reductions in the long term. Denial and legal restriction often led to increases in terrorism, while the effects of violence often depended upon whether the response was applied to organizations or their leaders. | |
Identifier: | CFE0004872 (IID), ucf:49670 (fedora) | |
Note(s): |
2013-08-01 M.A. Sciences, Political Science Masters This record was generated from author submitted information. |
|
Subject(s): | government -- responses -- terrorism | |
Persistent Link to This Record: | http://purl.flvc.org/ucf/fd/CFE0004872 | |
Restrictions on Access: | public 2013-08-15 | |
Host Institution: | UCF |