You are here

Identifying the Most Common Errors in Saudi University Students' Writing: Does the Prompt Matter?

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2016
Abstract/Description:
The purpose of this study was to investigate the most common writing errors made by undergraduate Saudi students with special focus on the five most common errors. The study also examined whether the type of prompt has an effect on the frequency of these errors. 58 English major students participated in this study, and each student wrote two timed essays. The first one was persuasive and the second one was compare and contrast. In order to analyze the data, the researcher used an error inventory developed by Bushong and Mihai (2012) based on Ferris (2002), which categorized ten types of errors. However, five other errors were added to this category later, which resulted in a combination of fifteen types of errors. The findings revealed that missing/unnecessary word was the most frequent type of error (17.86%), followed by spelling errors (15.66%), wrong choice (14.00%), article (7.68%), wrong noun form (6.68%). In addition, the results showed that the type of prompt had no effect on the number of errors. However, it had an influence on the frequency and types of errors, which was manifested in the differences between the last two categories of the five most common errors found in prompts A and B.
Title: Identifying the Most Common Errors in Saudi University Students' Writing: Does the Prompt Matter?.
0 views
0 downloads
Name(s): Barzanji, Amal, Author
Mihai, Florin, Committee Chair
Folse, Keith, Committee Member
Purmensky, Kerry, Committee Member
University of Central Florida, Degree Grantor
Type of Resource: text
Date Issued: 2016
Publisher: University of Central Florida
Language(s): English
Abstract/Description: The purpose of this study was to investigate the most common writing errors made by undergraduate Saudi students with special focus on the five most common errors. The study also examined whether the type of prompt has an effect on the frequency of these errors. 58 English major students participated in this study, and each student wrote two timed essays. The first one was persuasive and the second one was compare and contrast. In order to analyze the data, the researcher used an error inventory developed by Bushong and Mihai (2012) based on Ferris (2002), which categorized ten types of errors. However, five other errors were added to this category later, which resulted in a combination of fifteen types of errors. The findings revealed that missing/unnecessary word was the most frequent type of error (17.86%), followed by spelling errors (15.66%), wrong choice (14.00%), article (7.68%), wrong noun form (6.68%). In addition, the results showed that the type of prompt had no effect on the number of errors. However, it had an influence on the frequency and types of errors, which was manifested in the differences between the last two categories of the five most common errors found in prompts A and B.
Identifier: CFE0006071 (IID), ucf:50957 (fedora)
Note(s): 2016-05-01
M.A.
Arts and Humanities, Modern Languages
Masters
This record was generated from author submitted information.
Subject(s): Writing errors -- Error analysis -- Error patterns -- Saudi students -- University students -- EFL/ESL writing -- Types of prompts -- Frequency of errors -- Number of errors -- Writing prompts.
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/ucf/fd/CFE0006071
Restrictions on Access: public 2016-05-15
Host Institution: UCF

In Collections