You are here

UCF Digital Collections ยป ETD Collection

Ultrasound Measured Flexor Muscle Thickness in the Forearms of Rock Climbers

Download pdf | Full Screen View

Date Issued:
2019
Abstract/Description:
PURPOSE: To examine differences in the forearms of rock climbers using ultrasound to measure the muscle thickness of the finger flexors. METHODS: A total of 33 participants were recruited, 22 climbers (22.23 years; 68% male) and 11 controls (21.8; 55% male). Climbers provided self-reported ratings of their climbing ability, skill level, and preferred mode of climbing (e.g. sport climbing vs. bouldering). Anthropometric measures, including body fat percentage, were measured in all participants. Ultrasound measurements were taken with the participant lying on their back on a padded table with their dominant hand supinated. Muscle thickness measurements were taken at the forearm where a peak of the forearm flexors was identified on the medial aspect of the forearm after a circumference measurement and small mark was made. The distance from the ulna and radius to the muscle-skin interface was measured, as well as echo intensity surrounding the median nerve using a third party program. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of climbers rated themselves as (")intermediate("), and the other 50% rated themselves as (")advanced(") climbers, while 77% of the 22 climbers classified themselves as primarily (")sport climbers("), and 23% classified themselves as (")boulderers("). Body fat percentages were significantly different at 19.14(&)#177;6.99 and 30.02(&)#177;7.6 for climbers and controls. Ulnar and radial muscle thickness values were significantly higher in climbers, 4.23(&)#177;.39and 2.32(&)#177;.39, respectively, and 3.61(&)#177;.6 and 1.84(&)#177;.31 in controls (p(<).001). No differences in echo intensity were observed between climbers and non-climbers. DISCUSSION: The findings suggests that there are differences in flexor muscle thickness observed in earlier stages of rock climbing. Echo intensity of the flexor muscles were also measured, however significant variance in results warrants further investigation. Future studies should consider larger samples to better determine differences among muscle thickness and echo intensity across climbing abilities and mode of climbing, thus allowing for more specific training programs to be developed at each phase of training.
Title: Ultrasound Measured Flexor Muscle Thickness in the Forearms of Rock Climbers.
69 views
32 downloads
Name(s): Marsala, Michael, Author
Garcia, Jeanette, Committee Chair
Fukuda, David, Committee Member
Stock, Matt, Committee Member
University of Central Florida, Degree Grantor
Type of Resource: text
Date Issued: 2019
Publisher: University of Central Florida
Language(s): English
Abstract/Description: PURPOSE: To examine differences in the forearms of rock climbers using ultrasound to measure the muscle thickness of the finger flexors. METHODS: A total of 33 participants were recruited, 22 climbers (22.23 years; 68% male) and 11 controls (21.8; 55% male). Climbers provided self-reported ratings of their climbing ability, skill level, and preferred mode of climbing (e.g. sport climbing vs. bouldering). Anthropometric measures, including body fat percentage, were measured in all participants. Ultrasound measurements were taken with the participant lying on their back on a padded table with their dominant hand supinated. Muscle thickness measurements were taken at the forearm where a peak of the forearm flexors was identified on the medial aspect of the forearm after a circumference measurement and small mark was made. The distance from the ulna and radius to the muscle-skin interface was measured, as well as echo intensity surrounding the median nerve using a third party program. RESULTS: Approximately 50% of climbers rated themselves as (")intermediate("), and the other 50% rated themselves as (")advanced(") climbers, while 77% of the 22 climbers classified themselves as primarily (")sport climbers("), and 23% classified themselves as (")boulderers("). Body fat percentages were significantly different at 19.14(&)#177;6.99 and 30.02(&)#177;7.6 for climbers and controls. Ulnar and radial muscle thickness values were significantly higher in climbers, 4.23(&)#177;.39and 2.32(&)#177;.39, respectively, and 3.61(&)#177;.6 and 1.84(&)#177;.31 in controls (p(<).001). No differences in echo intensity were observed between climbers and non-climbers. DISCUSSION: The findings suggests that there are differences in flexor muscle thickness observed in earlier stages of rock climbing. Echo intensity of the flexor muscles were also measured, however significant variance in results warrants further investigation. Future studies should consider larger samples to better determine differences among muscle thickness and echo intensity across climbing abilities and mode of climbing, thus allowing for more specific training programs to be developed at each phase of training.
Identifier: CFE0007677 (IID), ucf:52473 (fedora)
Note(s): 2019-08-01
M.S.
Health Professions and Sciences, School of Kinesiology and Physical Therapy
Masters
This record was generated from author submitted information.
Subject(s): Rock Climbing -- Ultrasound -- Muscle Thickness -- Echo Intensity
Persistent Link to This Record: http://purl.flvc.org/ucf/fd/CFE0007677
Restrictions on Access: public 2019-08-15
Host Institution: UCF

In Collections