Current Search:  United States -- Military policy (x)

View All Items

  • CSV Spreadsheet
(1 - 4 of 4)
The crisis in U.S. defense
Title
The crisis in U.S. defense.
Creator
Knorr, Klaus Eugen
Date Issued
c1957
Identifier
2683733, CFDT2683733, ucf:5121
Format
Document (PDF)
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/2683733
Disarm to parley: A case for unilateral disarmament
Title
Disarm to parley: A case for unilateral disarmament.
Creator
Ferry, W. M.
Date Issued
1961
Identifier
361639, CFDT361639, ucf:5258
Format
Document (PDF)
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/361639
A proposal for a ban on the use of nuclear weapons
Title
A proposal for a ban on the use of nuclear weapons.
Creator
Halperin, Morton H.
Date Issued
1961
Identifier
2683244, CFDT2683244, ucf:5053
Format
Document (PDF)
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/FCLA/DT/2683244
DIVIDED GOVERNMENT AND CONGRESSIONAL FOREIGN POLICY: A CASE STUDY OF THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT
Title
DIVIDED GOVERNMENT AND CONGRESSIONAL FOREIGN POLICY: A CASE STUDY OF THE POST-WORLD WAR II ERA IN AMERICAN GOVERNMENT.
Creator
Feinman, David, Houghton, David, University of Central Florida
Abstract / Description
The purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between the executive and legislative branches of American federal government, during periods within which these two branches are led by different political parties, to discover whether the legislative branch attempts to independently legislate and enact foreign policy by using "the power of the purse" to either appropriate in support of or refuse to appropriate in opposition to military engagement abroad. The methodology for this...
Show moreThe purpose of this research is to analyze the relationship between the executive and legislative branches of American federal government, during periods within which these two branches are led by different political parties, to discover whether the legislative branch attempts to independently legislate and enact foreign policy by using "the power of the purse" to either appropriate in support of or refuse to appropriate in opposition to military engagement abroad. The methodology for this research includes the analysis and comparison of certain variables, including public opinion, budgetary constraints, and the relative majority of the party that holds power in one or both chambers, and the ways these variables may impact the behavior of the legislative branch in this regard. It also includes the analysis of appropriations requests made by the legislative branch for funding military engagement in rejection of requests from the executive branch for all military engagements that occurred during periods of divided government from 1946 through 2009.
Show less
Date Issued
2011
Identifier
CFE0003657, ucf:48840
Format
Document (PDF)
PURL
http://purl.flvc.org/ucf/fd/CFE0003657